The Future of Life, diversity | loss | problem | suggestions | triad | solutions | summary
|
![]() |
|---|---|
| E. O. Wilson | |
Òthe
effort to enlarge productive land will wipe out a large part of the worldÕs
flora and fauna.Ó
|
|
ÒWe need nature and particularly its wilderness strongholds. It is the alien world that gave rise to our species, and the home to which we can safely return. It offers choices our spirit was designed to enjoy." Page, 148. |
|
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | subsidized spoilage | remedies
(Book's last chapter)
Òour exertions also weaken
Earth.Ó
ÒWhat humanity is inflicting on itself and Earth is, to use a modern metaphor, the result of a mistake in capital investment. Having appropriated the planetÕs natural resources, we choose to annuitize them with short-term maturity reached by progressively increasing payouts. At the time it seemed a wise decision. To many it still does.
ÒMoreover they are being decapitalized by over harvesting and environmental destruction.Ó
149
ÒWith population and consumption continuing to grow, the per-capita resources left to be harvested are shrinking. The long-term prospects are not promising. Awakened at last to this approaching difficulty, we have begun a frantic search for substitutes.Ó
149-50
151
Òan instinct to behave ethically.Ó
151
ÒThe first step is to turn away from claims of inherent moral superiority based on political ideology and religious dogma. The problems of the environment have become too complicated to be solved by piety and an unyielding clash of good intentions.Ó
152
Twin Stereotypes –
Òtotal-war portraits crafted for public consumption by extremists on both
sides.Ó
People first critic vs.
Environmentalist
152-154
ÒThe precepts of the
people-firsters are foundationally just as ethical as those of the traditional
environmentalists, but there arguments are more about method and short-term
results.Ó
155
![]()
ÒThe juggernaut of
technology-based capitalism will not be stopped. Its momentum is reinforced by
billions of poor people in developing countries anxious to participate in order
to share the material wealth of industrialized nations.Ó
ÒScience and technology are
themselves reasons for optimism.Ó
156
Concrete measures such as the
ecological footprint and the Living Planet Index form the groundwork for wiser
economic planning. Science and technology also promise a means for raising
per-capita food production while decreasing materials and energy consumption,
both of which are preconditions for successful long-term conservation and a sustainable
economy.Ó
156-57
Role of religion reveals
global change in attitudes from dominion to stewardship
Òto active in conservation.Ó
158
Òsymptomatic of the trend
toward moral consensusÉÓ
159
ÒThe convergence in opinion
is strong enough that the problem is no longer reasons for conservation but the
best method to achieve it.Ó
160-64
ÒThe only secure way to save
species as well as the cheapest (and on the evidence the only sane way), is to
preserve the natural ecosystems they now compose.Ó
164
Earth is still productive
enough and human ingenuity creative enough not only to feed the world now but
also to raise the standard of living of the population projected to at least
the middle of the twenty-first century.Ó
ÒOne key element, the
protection and management of the worldÕs existing natural reserves, could be
financed by a one-cent-per-cup tax on coffee.Ó
164
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | subsidized spoilage | remedies
TRIAD
Private Sector

Government Science
and Technology
164
ÒThe private sector, working
within the public trust constraints defined by government policy, is the engine
of society. A strong economy improves the material quality of life, allowing
the populace to look and plan ahead in all venues important to them.Ó
165
The interlocking of three key
agents is vital to global conservation.Ó
NGOs, or ÒNon-governmental
organizations.Ó Conservation
International, CI
165-166
ÒThe swift ascendancy of the
NGOs reflects the perception within the global conservation movement that the
extinction crisis has turned critical.Ó
166
WWF ÒOne of the flagship
organizations.Ó
ÒBut its crusade steadily
broadened until it included all of the worldÕs threatened biodiversity.Ó
167

The five remaining frontier forests are:
NGOs can and do form partnerships, new means
of broadening influence
168
Six major NGOs and their membership
$50- $100 million per year,
multinational operations, like CI with fewer members
169
Òthe Red List books of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural resources, IUCN
170-171
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | goals | subsidized spoilage | remedies
ÒI found it a galling
experience to have to plead like a defense attorney in a court on behalf of
biodiversity, justifying its existence, asking that it be spared. I still feel
that wayÉÓ
171
Also under heavy pressure are
the rich hardwood and coniferous woodlands of western China and the southern
face of the Himalayas. Nepal, once gloriously clothed, has been largely denuded.Ó
ÒOne of the first
innovations, introduced in the 1980s, was the debt-for-nature-swaps.Ó
172
The first conservation
concession was obtained in 2000 by CI from Guyana, a smallÉ. interior
wilderness of mostly pristine rainforestÉ. Amerindians in the area will be
allowed to continue hunting, fishing and conducting small scale agriculture at
the level they practiced it for thousands of years.Ó
173
ÒGuyanaÉmakes at least as
much money as it would from a timber lease (200,000 acre tract)
174
Suriname initiative
illustrates the final of three stages of nature conservation.
1.
The creation of individual reserves Òreserves are the essential core of the
conservation agendaÉ but only a rearguard action.Ó
2.
the second stageÉis restoration, the enlargement of reserves by encouraging the re growth of natural habitat outward from the periphery of the
core reserve.
3. to
secure or rebuild wilderness by the
establishment of large natural corridors that connect existing parks and reserves.Ó
p. 177-78.
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | goals | subsidized spoilage | remedies
174-181
In 1990 dollars
ÒOne recent study suggests
that an investment of $28 billion is needed to maintain at least a
representative sample of EarthÕs ecosystems, land and sea, pole to pole. Beyond
a mere sample, a comparable sum would achieve a very high yield of species
level conservation through investment in the biologically richest segments,
especially in the tropics.
Ò$4 billion,Ó to manage
successfully what we have now protected.
182
ÒThe tropical wilderness areas and the hottest of the
hotspots on the land and in shallow marine habitats which together contain
perhaps 70% of Earths plant and animal species can be saved by a single
investment of $30 billion.Ó
Òabout one-thousandth of the
annual combined gross national products of the world--Ó
Ò$6 billion spent annually
worldwide for nature protectionÓ
So the question is do we refocus on the hottest of the hot spots for diversity
183
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | goals | subsidized spoilage | remedies
![]()
Me] if $33 trillion per
annum is the (see Costanza) annual value of all the EarthsÕs natural processes
combined, then:
30,000,000,000 30 x 109 1
33,000,000,000,000,000 33 x 1015
1,100,000
one in a million or $ 1 to
spend socially for every million dollars the Earth provides annually
Òsome of the needed
governmental funding can be freed by ending perverse subsidies that aid
individual industries but are unnecessary for the country as a whole and
harmful to the environment.Ó
p. 183.
Norman Myers, 1998 analysis of
annual subsidies worldwide.
$390 to $520 billion for agriculture
$
110 billion in energy for fossil fuels and nuclear
$
220 billion for water
$
850-720 billion in sum
Three quarters of a trillion dollars or more (1998 value) annually in subsidies for food, water and energy.
Òharmful to both our economies and our governments.Ó
ÒAn additional heavy price,
difficult to measure but nevertheless substantial, is levied on the natural
environment, which carries the burden of extraction and consumption.Ó
ÒThe average American pays
$2000 a year in subsidies, giving the lie to the belief the t the American economy
runs in a truly free competitive market. (-Enterprise)
184
![]()
"Monetize" carbon dioxide waste
Kyoto Protocol,ÉÓwould slow
the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses threatening to
trigger the runaway warming of the EarthÕs climate.Ó
184
ESA - Endangered Species Act
(1973) 390-12 HR and 92-0 Senate
ÒWithout dispute, the most important conservation law in the history of the USÉ. unprecedented in its sweep. Éevery kind of plant and animal at riskÉ.
Conclusion: in balancing human
and biological diversityÕs needs
The sheer loss | Planet Index | solution's cost | remaining forested areas | goals | subsidized spoilage | remedies.
![]()