"We all live downstream on round river." As Aldo Leopold reminded us, by that statement, we all partake in a generously renewing cycle of life. Luna Leopold, his son, said that by the 1960s the time had come for the nation to develop an ethical change in attitudes, behavior and understanding of water. We stand still, at this fork in the stream where we are of two views, one mind-set focused on using up all of our renewable resources, like water; the other mind-set saying to respect the limits of nature. This is an excursion into the ecological connections among water, landscape, wildlife and people which suggests we must pursue Luna Leopold's quest for a moral vision with respect to water the mover of worlds.
Humans have become an unnecessary planetary threat to our own survival because the atmospheric, water, and marine pollution created by industrial consumer nations is dragging us into debt. This increasing national and international debt has robbed us of the opportunity to pay for environmental restoration or invest in the wilderness required by urban areas to sustain their municipal needs for water, energy, recreation, and resources.
Luna Leopold, like his father Aldo, was aware of the consumption
pressures on renewable resources and that failure of markets to allocate essential
materials could threaten water and all that is dependent in our world for the
constantly renewing fresh water cycle. The market failures that have contributed to
the destruction of natural areas that are vital to the earth's ecological life
support system must be restored and retained undiminished. This is because industrial activity
and conspicuous consumption drastically increase the rate at which natural resources
are exploited, reducing their capacity to resiliently absorb impacts, pollution, and recover from damages.
The active promotion of genetic diversity through conscious planning, collecting, and stewarding of rare plants and animals as well as the protection of sufficiently vast habitats for their proliferation is an international imperative.
Ozone, acidity & carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere must not be drastically altered if we are to survive as a civilized species. Our cities will slide beyond their current intolerable conditions should we further destroy our open spaces. Whether these areas are farms, wetlands, forests, sand hills, or river banks sufficient open space is critical for the survival of cities and their civilizations. Everything needs to breathe -- and cities are no exception -- their residents require the myriad natural services provided by these open spaces.
National Forests supply Denver, Salt Lake City, Los Angeles,
and San Diego with water. The southern ranges of the great Smoky Mountains
sustains oyster beds in northern Florida. The snow melt and runoff from the
Sierra Nevada once sustained salmon fishery runs from the Pacific Ocean up into
the streams where spawning grounds for adult salmon where scattered beneath
the well forested watershed.
We are hardly aware that trees and vegetation redistribute water from the ground into the air. This process of evaporation and transpiration accompanies the production of oxygen. Without oxygen we could not survive. The precise amount of oxygen in our atmosphere allows combustion to occur, without a global conflagrations, where all vegetation might burn, spontaneously from the explosive power of too rich a mixture of oxygen. Oxygen is created by plants and bacteria in the presence of sunlight, by removing the one oxygen atom from the water molecule. All living things are largely made of water.
Unless we commit to identify, protect, nurture and restore the ecological communities that sustain our cities, industries and define our regional character we will have no benchmark against which to measure our achievements. Water is a one benchmark we use to measure human impacts, air quality is another. But wild creatures are an even more revealing marker of our affects on the surrounding milieu, because nature is an assembly of functioning parts and wildlife tell us how those parts work. A new group of environmental ethics advocates suggest that nature imparts meaning to our human condition.
The choice is ours, continue to harvest timber and fail to personally plant a tree. At the heart of that attitude lies another behavioral obstacle to restoring the planet's assimilative capacity. The time is running out , our global experiment in altering the constituent elements of the atmosphere is about to extinguish the very values we sought to nourish in our headlong pursuit of conspicuous consumption and material wealth. What happens in these open spaces directly affects the health of urban residents who consume vast quantities of water on a daily basis.
We can either make use of what is at hand to diminish our impact and restore the vegetation of our world or we can curse the darkness. If we fail to identify what it is we really need to mutually sustain ourselves and our earth our civilization is not worthy to survive. Archie Carr had a vision for Florida that we embrace today and pledge to promote a water, fishery and wildlife restoration ethic. He, like George Perkins Marsh, 150 years ago, believed we needed to restore our scenic beauty and wildlife by protecting our waters. They knew, as did Frederick Law Olmsted, Spencer Fullerton Baird, and Ellen Swallow Richards that clean water is the key to our own health, the scenic beauty we so admire and the diversity of wild populations thriving in a variety of our forests, natural areas, wetlands, prairies and wild ocean shores.
We dare not neglect water quality. But, we are building roads over our water recharge areas, dumping sewage and septic ooze right into our rivers, lakes and lagoons and over fertilizing our landscapes so that lakes and streams choke on the runoff.
To protect ourselves we must keep our air and water contaminant free. As our drinking water supplies shrink we must conserve water, enforce high quality standards for water use and reward those who reduce their waste of this vital source of health and human security.
At this fork in the journey to redefine the human condition as intimately dependent upon the earth's life support structures (air, water, fuel, and wilderness) we have to decide what it is we are capable of effectively accomplishing in restoring the biological diversity of those gene pools we are exploiting if not extinguishing. For us to develop, promote and practice a water ethic is of primary importance for this new, twenty-first century.
Water and Climate