The Peek A Boo World, Chapter 5.
Amusing Ourselves to Death, pp, 64-80.
Themes: Building on the idea that we are great abbreviators and
that discourse abbreviates thought, he assumes:
Conquest of space
The solution to these problems was electricity
Telegraphy did something that Morse did not foresee
ÒOne
neighborhood of the whole country.Ó
Strangers
became neighbors
Created
its own definition of discourse
Irrelevance,
impotence and incoherence were introduced by telegraphy in redefining discourse
ÒThe telegraph made information into a
commodity, a ÔthingÕ that
could
be bought and sold irrespective of its source of meaning.Ó (65)
Partnership between telegraph and newspapers altered
journalism, content, & connotation.
Baltimore Patriot reporting of the
Congressional debate on the Oregon issue
Òthis indeed was an
annihilation of space.Ó (the news report said).
Newspapers investing in
telegraphy was a sign of the future in 1850s
May 24, 1844 Samuel F. B. Morse opened the telegraph
office, (later: Western Union, A T & T.)
1848 AP or Associated Press,
a wire service established to send stories for newspaper reporting.
Òtelegraphy made relevance, irrelevant.Ó
Òpopulated by strangers who
knew nothing but the most superficial facts about each other.Ó
p. 67.
INFORM
Òinformation derives its
importance from the possibilities of action
ÒBut most of our daily news is inert.Ó
ÒInformation
: action ratioÓ was altered
Òinformation glutÓ
is a condition wherein the I:A
ration diminishes capacity to act, or
Change úÆú ÒWhat steps do you
plan to take?Ó
ÒVoting we might say Is the last best refuge of
the politically impotent.Ó
Information – Òdid
not permit the right of reply.Ó
ÒDignify irrelevance and amplify impotence.Ó
Òtelegraphy exact opposite
of typography (p. 69)
Books – Òorganized analysis of information.Ó Òit takes timeÓ
Telegraphy fails to pass the Òtest of permanence,
continuity or coherence.Ó
ÒSensational, fragmented, impersonalÓ
headline culture, disconnected
messages
Telegraph wrought a world – delivered by newspapers—of
fragments & discontinuities.
GRAPHICALITY
Louis Daguerre was re-conceiving the meaning of
nature –or realty itself.Ó
Page,
71.
ÒThe daguerreotype it gives her the power to
reproduce herself.Ó
Òrefashioning nature to
make it comprehensible and manageable.Ó
Òhe had invented the
worldÕs first cloning device.Ó
HerschelÕs name Òwriting with lightÓ had an ironic
quality
Photography and writing emerged into two different
universes of discourse
(p. 71)
Photography as a Òlanguage is a risky metaphorÓ
because it has a limited vocabulary
Photo lacks a syntax,
making it unable to argue with the world
The point of photography is to isolate images from
context.Ó
(Sontag refer.) p. 73
ÒLike telegraphy photography recreates the world as
a series of idiosyncratic eventsÓ
ÒThe sudden and massive intrusion of the photograph
into the symbolic environsÓ
CRITIC
The Image by Daniel Boorstin
BoorstinÕs Òfierce assault of machine
produced imagesÓ on language
Òthe picture forced
exposition into the background.Ó
Òobliterated it altogetherÓ
telegraphic Ònews from nowhereÓ was
perfectly complemented by photos
the context created by tele-&photography was Òof course entirely illusory.Ó
People once gathered information to manage the real
contexts of their lives,
now they had to invent contexts
(crossword puzzles) in which otherwise useless i
nformation might be put to some
apparent use.Ó
p.
76.
FACTICITY
The major Òcreation of the graphic revolution was
the pseudo-eventÓ specifically staged
to be reported.Ó
ÒThe
pseudo-context is the last refuge,É
of a culture overwhelmed by
irrelevance, incoherence, and impotence.Ó
p. 76.
A language that denied interconnectedness, proceeded
without context, argued the irrelevance of history, explained nothing and
offered fascination in place of complexity and coherence.Ó
Òa world that does not ask
us,--does not permit us to do anythingÓ
Childishly Òpeek a booÓ world that is endlessly
entertaining
p. 77.
PSYCHOLOGY
ÒThe problem comes when we try to live in them.Ó (our dreams)
Television
allowed us to actually Òlive in themÓ
p. 78.
TV I the command center of the new epistemologyÓ
shaped by the biases of TV
TV Òarranges our communications environment for us
in waysÓ no other medium can
Computer literacy in the future – but TV is
the Òmeta-mediumÓ
Altering not only structuring what we know
Òbut our knowledge of the ways
of knowing as well.Ó
p. 79.
Status of myth –
Òwhich is a way of
understanding the world that is not problematic.Ó
– Roland Barths
[tie to Lakoff
and Greider]
ÒWe do not doubt the reality of what we see on
television.Ó
P. 79
PURPOSE
Òthe background radiation
of the social and intellectual universe.Ó No longer strange
Òthe world as given to us
through television seems natural, and not bizarre.Ó
ÒMake
the epistemology of television visible again.Ó
80
ÒFor the loss
of the sense of the strange is a sign of adjustment, and
the extent to which we have adjusted
is a measure of the
extent to which we have been
changed.Ó
Pp. 79-80.