The Peek A Boo World, Chapter 5.

 

Amusing Ourselves to Death, pp, 64-80.

Themes: Building on the idea that we are great abbreviators and that discourse abbreviates thought, he assumes:

Conquest of space

The solution to these problems was electricity

Telegraphy did something that Morse did not foresee

       ÒOne neighborhood of the whole country.Ó

              Strangers became neighbors

              Created its own definition of discourse

       Irrelevance, impotence and incoherence were introduced by telegraphy in redefining discourse

 

 

    ÒThe telegraph made information into a commodity, a ÔthingÕ that  

       could be bought and sold irrespective of its source of meaning.Ó (65)

 

 

Partnership between telegraph and newspapers altered journalism, content, & connotation.

 

Baltimore Patriot reporting of the Congressional debate on the Oregon issue

Òthis indeed was an annihilation of space.Ó (the news report said).

 

Newspapers investing in telegraphy was a sign of the future in 1850s

 

May 24, 1844 Samuel F. B. Morse opened the telegraph office, (later: Western Union, A T & T.)

 

1848 AP or Associated Press, a wire service established to send stories for newspaper reporting.

 

Òtelegraphy made relevance, irrelevant.Ó

 

Òpopulated by strangers who knew nothing but the most superficial facts about each other.Ó

p. 67.

 

INFORM

 

Òinformation derives its importance from the possibilities of action

 

ÒBut most of our daily news is inert.Ó

 

ÒInformation :  action ratioÓ was altered

      

Òinformation glutÓ

is a condition wherein the I:A ration diminishes capacity to act, or

Change  úÆú  ÒWhat steps do you plan to take?Ó

 

        ÒVoting we might say Is the last best refuge of the politically impotent.Ó

 

        Information – Òdid not permit the right of reply.Ó

 

ÒDignify irrelevance and amplify impotence.Ó 

 

Òtelegraphy exact opposite of typography (p. 69)

 

Books – Òorganized analysis of information.Ó Òit takes timeÓ

 

Telegraphy fails to pass the Òtest of permanence, continuity or coherence.Ó

ÒSensational, fragmented, impersonalÓ

headline culture, disconnected messages

 

Telegraph wrought a world – delivered by newspapers—of fragments & discontinuities.

 

GRAPHICALITY

 

Louis Daguerre was re-conceiving the meaning of nature –or realty itself.Ó

                                                                                                   Page, 71.

 

ÒThe daguerreotype it gives her the power to reproduce herself.Ó

 

Òrefashioning nature to make it comprehensible and manageable.Ó

 

Òhe had invented the worldÕs first cloning device.Ó

 

HerschelÕs name Òwriting with lightÓ had an ironic quality

 

Photography and writing emerged into two different universes of discourse

 (p. 71)

 

Photography as a Òlanguage is a risky metaphorÓ because it has a limited vocabulary

 

Photo lacks a syntax, making it unable to argue with the world

 

The point of photography is to isolate images from context.Ó

(Sontag refer.) p. 73

 

ÒLike telegraphy photography recreates the world as a series of idiosyncratic eventsÓ

 

ÒThe sudden and massive intrusion of the photograph into the symbolic environsÓ

 

CRITIC

 

The Image by Daniel Boorstin

BoorstinÕs Òfierce assault of machine produced imagesÓ on language

 

Òthe picture forced exposition into the background.Ó

 

Òobliterated it altogetherÓ

 

telegraphic Ònews from nowhereÓ was perfectly complemented by photos

the context created by tele-&photography was Òof course entirely illusory.Ó

 

People once gathered information to manage the real contexts of their lives,

now they had to invent contexts (crossword puzzles) in which otherwise useless i

nformation might be put to some apparent use.Ó

                                                                                                   p. 76.

 

FACTICITY

 

The major Òcreation of the graphic revolution was the pseudo-eventÓ specifically staged to be reported.Ó

 

ÒThe pseudo-context is the last refuge,É

of a culture overwhelmed by irrelevance, incoherence, and impotence.Ó                   

p. 76.

 

A language that denied interconnectedness, proceeded without context, argued the irrelevance of history, explained nothing and offered fascination in place of complexity and coherence.Ó

 

Òa world that does not ask us,--does not permit us to do anythingÓ

 

 Childishly Òpeek a booÓ world that is endlessly entertaining

 p. 77.

 

 

PSYCHOLOGY

 

ÒThe problem comes when we try to live in them.Ó (our dreams)

 

Television allowed us to actually Òlive in themÓ

p. 78.

 

TV I the command center of the new epistemologyÓ shaped by the biases of TV

 

TV Òarranges our communications environment for us in waysÓ no other medium can

Computer literacy in the future – but TV is the Òmeta-mediumÓ

Altering not only structuring what we know

Òbut our knowledge of the ways of knowing as well.Ó

p. 79.

 

Status of myth

Òwhich is a way of understanding the world that is not problematic.Ó

– Roland Barths

[tie to Lakoff and Greider]

 

ÒWe do not doubt the reality of what we see on television.Ó 

P. 79

 

PURPOSE

 

Òthe background radiation of the social and intellectual universe.Ó No longer strange

 

Òthe world as given to us through television seems natural, and not bizarre.Ó

 

ÒMake the epistemology of television visible again.Ó

80

 

ÒFor the loss of the sense of the strange is a sign of adjustment, and

the extent to which we have adjusted is a measure of the

extent to which we have been changed.Ó

Pp. 79-80.