value of wild areas

Navigating the site:

Art

Articles

Authors

Autonomy

Bibliography

Biodiversity

Briefings

Capacity

Concepts

Conserve

CORE acronym

Courses

Ecology

Eco-design

Exchange

Facts

Genes

Inquiry

Methods

New

Office

Photos

Presentations

Recent material

Research

Reviews

Science

Science subjects

Site Map

Sources

Technology time line

Technology

Tragedy

Vita

Vocabulary

WEAL acronym

Wilderness

Writing

book

World view

Z-A search this site

 

 

return to top of the page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


return to previously viewed page

How the Earth's wild areas are significant to protect from harm, loss or decay.

dialectic | preservation | Alaskan case study | Transboundary pollution


Organizing our ideas about protection of land and water resources.

A dialectical approach:

Two views: Nash Alaska & Pollan: a dialectic one view contradicts the other.

Nash. pp. 272-315.

Second Nature, Michael Pollan, 1991. pp. 209-238.


Dialectic means two opposing or contradictory views that –it is implied-- must be reconciled.

Roderick Frazier Nash
versus
Michael Pollan,
The wild ideal
vs.
The Idea of a Garden
Nash wilderness is sacred ground
vs.
Wilderness is inadequate to meet our current needs.
Necessary now, more than ever before!
vs.
The garden is a more accurate description of what we need.

Pollan, the Garden is a cultivated and responsible ideal.

Nash, we are a nation of wilds, wildness defines our character as a people.

"In Wildness is the preservation of the world."

Concord Lyceum address, by Thoreau in Nash, p. 84.

Seven reasons to protect wild areas include:

  • Historico - cultural Fire, invasive exotic plants
  • Scientific, ecological Introduced animals
  • Commercial l- recreational Loss of biological diversity
  • Survival of indigenous people impacts on the resources

Case study is Alaskan Wilderness

DNA

Widespread belief among conservationists that “ Alaska could be different.” (p. 291)


Who Robert Marshall, 1920s Alaska Wilderness “the last frontier” (p. 272)


What an area 1/5 or 20% the size of the US. With < 150.000 in 1959
When Alaskan Native Claims settlement Act,12-18-1971, & the oil pipeline
Where Between Russia and Canada, the Pacific and Arctic Oceans
How Do we balance the necessity of resources for industrial economy with:

    1. Subsistence: Aleuts, Inuit, Athabaskan and other native peoples
    2. Nation’s natural heritage preservation tradition: Muir & Gannett on the Harriman expedition. Is scenery more valuable than timber & hides?
    3. Recreation and tourism


Development and Conservation

Arctic biology and biogeography: permafrost, tundra, caribou, musk ox.
Background is Leopold, Marshall, and a comparative approach to saving wildlife & wild areas
(16, A philosophy of protection Nash, pp. 238-271.)

Ginny Wood (compare to Mardy Murie, in Williams) “space, spectacularly beautiful space that is not all filled up with people and industry…” See Gannett’s idea (Harriman expedition) about scenic values.


• Commercial Values “Project Chariot: atomic bomb built harbor at Port Hope 1958.”
• Ecological Values Wildlife, fisheries, salmon, 1891 Afognak Island Wildlife Refuge.
• Scenic Values Brooks Range, Denali, Glacier Bay, Chugach Rain Forest
• Survival (subsistence) Values homesteading, trap, prospect, hunt & fish.


How do we manage conflict between oil drilling on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge?

Hetch Hetchy legacy similar to Yukon Flats Reservoir and Ramparts Dam project 1959
Dinosaur National Monument legacy: National Interest Lands

Conservation Act, 12-2-80.
104 million acres set aside, 56 million acres of wilderness
trebled size of wild areas in US while it assures native rights to land.


What are our values trying to achieve?
Utilitarian versus ecological criteria: Arctic North Slope oil,

Naval Petroleum Reserve # 4. The energy reserve on the high frontier.


Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea fisheries


“Its tough up here…this country can kill you.”

Alaska Governor Walter “Wally” Hickel

“the whole concept of wilderness in Alaska is ethnocentric to the point of being insulting.” (p. 277)



Our Common Threat: ecological consequences of pollution at a distance: McKibben, pp. 1-44.

Mid-Term * report: compare Nash w/ Leopold’s “A Taste for Country” pp. 177-226. (oral)
What is a wilderness philosophy and does the Pollan challenge undermine the urgency of protecting the wild?

Step 2: Show how a Taste for Country --by Leopold-- relates to or reconciles this split in protecting wild natural areas that separate Nash from Pollan.

(by comparing Leopold, Nash, Pollan, & Williams in a brief essay. )


Possible Field trip to the Chelonian Institute, Oviedo, Alafaya Trail N of Mitchell Hammock Road Decide Thursday or Friday 1 PM - 4 PM:

protecting wild species; endangered species and adequate resources.


dialectic | preservation | Alaskan case study | Transboundary pollution

Genetics | Science Index | Site Analysis | Population Index | Global Warming Index | Nature Index | Brief