Beyond our Fourth Dimension
 |
|
|
|
Another Dimension |
|
| |
|
|
| |
by Joseph Siry |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Susan Griffin explains it, [a story is] but a way of narrating events that
gives the listener a path through those events that leads to some fragment
of wisdom. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
From beneath the water
what may a breaking wave appear to be to the school of fish below? As you swim beneath the wave, look up and do you not see a faintly familiar pattern? How is the
disturbance of the ocean's surface wave similar to events we see in our world of the air above the waves? Is this crushing water sort of like
the cloud formations we see in the sky above our heads on a stormy day? I will now further suggest that both of these events
are not so different from what we experience when we see the Aurora Borealis
in the northern hemisphere or the Aurora Australis in the southern hemisphere. Instead of water molecules, do we see ions in collision? |
A surface wave breaking resembles a cloud in the sky when seen from underwater. |
| |
| Are theses natural features that we see not harbingers of forces in another dimension
that hint to us --because they clue in the more suggestive among us-- that there is a concrete
condition beyond what we call the firm reality of our furtive thoughts? Beyond
the validity of our fleeting senses, does there loom beyond our vision more than three dimensions?
One must take care though, as we try to represent these facts about four, five or more dimensions in our stories that we should not make mistakes. But starting in this story with the fifth dimension will suffice because I want you to think of that dimension as the electromagnetic sea in which we are immersed, but may not comprehend very well. |
|
|
Considering more dimensions than we ordinarily sense is likely to be fraught with errors. But as insensible as it may seem, Einstein –in trying to make sense of the force of gravity– suggested that there could be a fourth dimension that he called spacetime. Making sense of the insensible is a dangerous vocation, that turns into a solitary madness should
no one else agree with you. Or worse, if others agree with you, then you may suspect that you are all part of a mass hallucination because merely the deranged will agree
with you.
Are we able to unravel the clues, the hints, or the suggestions hidden behind
the appearances of the Aurora? Is there a lesson to learn within St. Elmo's
fire? Can we admit with honest incredulity that we exist suspended in a sea
of electrical discharges, floating amongst seas neutrinos as numerous as water
drops in the ocean? Do we not dance about on a hidden froth of quantum foam?
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Now think that for most people there are but three dimensions. But they are asleep to
the fourth and fifth. Now most
people will think I am mad at worst and deluded at best. But there are inklings
all around us of extensions beyond the length, width and depth of places that
fourth and even fifth dimensions lurk beneath our self-satisfied 3-d views.
Such thoughts infect anyone reading Einstein's explanation of the speed of light
and I see now why in a Journey to Another
Dimension by Michio
Kaku suggests that mathematicians have expressions for these fourth and
fifth dimensional extensions of space into the realms of time and electromagnetic
fields. More recently Brian Greene has said that there are six additional dimensions
of space curled up within the comforting and familiar edges of the rooms we
haunt. |
| |
|
|
Well hidden dimensions of elusive fields are the problem in
this story of what do we call the fifth dimension? Einstein called the fourth
dimension, spacetime, because he perceived that the world
changed profoundly due to acceleration. That is the faster one moves --the more
quickly one travels in a train down the tracks-- the more distorted is the experience
of three dimensions becomes to us in terms of our length, width and height bound
world. So as we speed into, well into the future, accelerating relentlessly,
Einstein recognized that the first familiar fiction we live by --simultaneity--
disappears. Right now you think that you and I are simultaneously in the room
together speaking. At or near the speed of light, Einstein concluded from the
hint he had about acceleration, there is no meaning to the word simultaneous
if it means happening at the same time when traveling at light speed over very
small distances.
|
|
|
|