Both the genetic viability and the fertility of the soil
are preconditions for a successful approach to agricultural food
harvesting, logging requires costly
investments to attain higher yields.
With 2 billion people no; with 6 billion yes because we
are consuming the worlds biotic wealth at an unassimilative
rate. (coffee, sugar, tea, rice, milk & meat dictate land
We are eating the capital (calcium in a German forest),
failing to reinvest fully (reforestation), and auctioning off
the entail (ANWR) [ commons ] that is derived from biotic wealths
steady accumulation ( Leopolds slowly revolving fund of
No but appetite may be.
Are we playing Russian roulette?
It is not what we need that is significant, but that we feel we need more than actually we do require to comfortably survive. (without losing biological diversity, carrying capacity, or increasing pollution.)
Medicinal plants come from certain, particular landscapes.
Social sciences Technology index Nature index Words index Photograph index
Terms | Glossary | Word webs | Basic vocabulary | Advanced Vocabulary | Antonyms | Synonyms | Obscure words
ecology, impact formula, carrying capacity, space to live